This type of research can be used to describe characteristics that exist in a community, but not to determine cause-and-effect relationships between different variables. This method is often used to make inferences about possible relationships or to gather preliminary data to support further research and experimentation.
For example, researchers studying developmental psychology might select groups of people who are different ages but investigate them at one point in time. By doing this, any differences between the age groups can presumably be attributed to age differences rather than something that happened over time.
Defining Characteristics of Cross-Sectional Studies
Some of the key characteristics of a cross-sectional study include:
- The study takes place at a single point in time
- It does not involve manipulating variables
- It allows researchers to look at numerous characteristics at once (age, income, gender, etc.)
- It's often used to look at the prevailing characteristics in a given population
- It can provide information about what is happening in a current population
This type of research is frequently used to determine the prevailing characteristics in a population at a certain point in time. For example, a cross-sectional study might be used to determine if exposure to specific risk factors might correlate with particular outcomes.
A researcher might collect cross-sectional data on past smoking habits and current diagnoses of lung cancer, for example. While this type of study cannot demonstrate cause and effect, it can provide a quick look at correlations that may exist at a particular point.
For example, researchers may find that people who reported engaging in certain health behaviors were also more likely to be diagnosed with specific ailments. While a cross-sectional study cannot prove for certain that these behaviors caused the condition, such studies can point to a relationship worth investigating further.
Cross-sectional studies are popular because they have several benefits that make them useful to researchers.
Inexpensive and Fast
Cross-sectional studies usually allow researchers to collect a great deal of information quite quickly. Data is often obtained inexpensively using self-report surveys. Researchers are then able to amass large amounts of information from a large pool of participants.
Researchers can collect data on a few different variables to see how differences in sex, age, educational status, and income, for example, might correlate with the critical variable of interest.
Prompts Further Study
While cross-sectional studies cannot be used to determine causal relationships, they can provide a useful springboard to further research. When looking at a public health issue, such as whether a particular behavior might be linked to a particular illness, researchers might utilize a cross-sectional study to look for clues that will serve as a useful tool to guide further experimental studies.
For example, researchers might be interested in learning how exercise influences cognitive health as people age. They might collect data from different age groups on how much exercise they get and how well they perform on cognitive tests. Performing such a study can give researchers clues about the types of exercise that might be the most beneficial to cognitive health and inspire further experimental research on the subject.
No method of research is perfect. Cross-sectional studies also have potential drawbacks.
Can't Differentiate Cause and Effect
Other variables can affect the relationship between the inferred cause and outcomes, and this type of research doesn't allow for conclusions about causation.
Groups can be affected by cohort differences that arise from the particular experiences of a unique group of people. Individuals born during the same period may share important historical experiences, but people in that group who are born in a given geographic region may share experiences limited solely to their physical location.
Surveys or questionnaires about certain aspects of people's lives may not always result in accurate reporting, and there is usually not a mechanism for verifying this information.
Cross-Sectional vs. Longitudinal Studies
This type of research differs from longitudinal studies in that cross-sectional studies are designed to look at a variable at a particular point in time. Longitudinal studies involve taking multiple measures over an extended period.
As you might imagine, longitudinal studies tend to require more resources and are often more expensive than cross-sectional resources. They are also more likely to be influenced by what is known as selective attrition, which means that some individuals are simply more likely to drop out of a study than others. This can influence the validity of the study.
One of the advantages of cross-sectional studies is that since data is collected all at once, it's less likely that participants will quit the study before data is fully collected.
A Word From YoStatistician Consultancy
Cross-sectional studies can be a useful research tool in many areas of health research. By learning more about what is going on in a specific population, researchers are better able to understand relationships that might exist between certain variables and develop further studies that explore these conditions in greater depth
Address: 21 Joe Slovo, Zumaysha House, Durban 4001, South Africa
Landline: 031 305 0010
Mobile | WhatsApp: 067 851 2614